(Author Unknown)
An esplanade that heralds the historic shipyard’s maritime flavor is, perhaps, best exemplified in the galvalume wall that separates the 'blue-box' store from the park, likely essential to the plan's mitigation of public-private space. A colourful and abstracted montage that, from a distance, resembles the stacked assemblage of freight containers provides a visually stunning backdrop that serves to mask the vehicular parking entrance, brings the scale of the building down to grade, and competes with the iconically branded store colours of the IKEA brand. The animated shadows of the leafless trees dance across this staged backdrop making up for the lack of performative programming during 'winter hours'.
Nearly as stunning - at least during the late-day glow of the falling sun - is the creative use of the site's 'chocks' to mask the parking lots from the waterfront. Affixed with the names of ships that were once repaired here, the missing (metallic) letters that have been pried from their memorial location is evidence of the more 'natural ecologies' of this park, and a testament to the nature of our time. Other more successful and subtle attempts at preservation are evidenced in the stone-block outline that reveals itself throughout the site, breaking the monotony and expanse of asphalt and at the same time demarcating the original walls of the 700-foot-long graving (dry) dock. Unfortunately the recurring motif of crisscrossing lines throughout - apparently inspired by shadows cast from masts of ships - strikes me as more of an afterthought that is visually confusing and likely more symbolic of IKEA's 'knotty' role as the private owner of a public park.
Most iconic in the designs reference to the industrial past of the Todd Shipyards are the four gantry cranes, stationed across the site. Perhaps erected to pay tribute to the others that were abandoned at the bottom of the basin - too consumed by nature to be preserved - there are a number of 'tee-pee-like' steel structures that host signage at strategic points of wayfinding. Unfortunately these, again, appear to be more of an overly abstracted reference to an industrial history that more resembles a pile of steel kindling waiting to be lit; as if marking the way for ships attempting to navigate the coastline of New Amsterdam.
The park is both impressive and lonely. Despite being ahead of its time and lacking in its 'product development' there is an eery quietness, perhaps monumental-like quality to this place. While there is no overtly oppressive resistance to public occupation of this park - in fact, I believe it makes economic sense to be highly encouraged - through regular policing, there is no question that this park is more public now than it has ever been. Commanding stunning views of New York's working waterfront, providing a supportive amenity to the water-taxi service, and serving its place in a long-term plan to provide continuous waterfront access throughout the burrough and beyond, the public is left to ponder the 'improvements' to the site's inherited past. Now that they have a public space "product at a price so low that as many people as possible will be able to enjoy it", only they may decide if such products are of equal value to a zoning change that has delivered another big blue box.